Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics读书介绍

Most models of political decision-making maintain that individual preferences remain relatively constant. Why, then, are there often sudden abrupt changes in public opinion on political issues? Or total reversals in congressional support for specific legislation, as happened with the voting on the Superconducting Supercollider? Bryan D. Jones answers these questions by connecting insights from cognitive science and rational choice theory to political life. Individuals and political systems alike, Jones argues, tend to be attentive to only one issue at a time. Using numerous examples from elections, public-opinion polls, congressional deliberations and bureaucratic decision-making, he shows how shifting attentiveness can and does alter choices and political outcomes - even when underlying preferences remain relatively fixed. An individual, for example, may initially decide to vote for a candidate because of her stand on spending, but change his vote when he learns of her position on abortion, never really balancing the two options.

布赖恩·D.琼斯，美国华盛顿大学政治学教授，得克萨斯农工大学文理学院政治学教授，美国政治与公共政策研究中心主任，美国政治学会执行理事，美国中西政治学会副会长，国际公共政策、公共管理与政府决策领域的知名专家。他与弗兰克·鲍姆加特纳合著的《美国政治的议程与不稳定性》获美国政治学会“艾伦·威尔达夫斯基政策研究奖”，是公共政策领域的经典著作。其《再思民主政治中的决策制定》与《政治与选择的架构》获美国政治学会政治心理学会的“罗伯特·莱恩奖”。

Reconceiving大结局Decision-Making大结局Democratic大结局Politics大结局in大结局

剧情呢，免费看分享剧情、挑选影视作品、精选好书简介分享。